Jennifer Highsmith :: Projects

  Department: Physiological Science
   
  Back
 

Desgin By Sequence

Title: DNArt
Medium: Fine tipped ball point pens on thick printer paper, approximately 7'4" by 6"

     
 
   
 
     

Summary:Only fifty years ago were the details of DNA beginning to be discovered. Now scientists can manipulate this thread of life down to the base pair.But before the genetic code for making proteins was broken, Max Delbruck and George W. Beadle wrote messages back and forth using colored toothpicks for their nucleotides. My project uses a series of shapes from the video game Tetris to represent each triplet DNA codon. Each amino acid coded for is then changed into the one letter scientific abbreviation (except O, which is methiOnine). Gaps in the top and bottom rows of the strands are analogous to the major and minor grooves of DNA. When translated the top strand reads (spaces added): DOES EVERYONE PLAY WITH DNA?

The bottom strand reads:DOES ONE PLAY WITH EVERY DNA? To make this bottom strand I used transposition mutations and a point mutation. Notice the subtleties of the strand difference even though these two questions have contrasting meanings. There is no stop codon like on the top strand to represent that the last statement is an ongoing question. Once genetic manipulation is not just limited to scientists and students, at what organism and level do we stop? The questions posed when these strands are translated into protein should constantly be asked in science and in life.

The DNA base pairs are as follows: pink for C, blue for G, green for A, and purple for T (or U when the protein is translated into RNA). I'd like to thank Tetris and it creators for providing me with inspiration for the base pairs. Additional thanks to Nyla Zender, Betty Luceigh, and Frederick Freking for teaching me about the genetic code and its amino acids in fascinating detail.

     
     

Genetic Art Proposal

     
Title: "Jamie Marie Highsmith"    
     
Summary: For my genetic artwork synthesis, I will be creating an original yet hypothetical work. I would like to see what would happen if I engineered a future child of my parents to prevent her from inheriting a genetic "flaw" I have. However, with the family history of my mother and father brought into play, my future sister may end up inheriting other less desirable qualities. Characteristics of my mother, father, myself, and of my hypothetical sister will be compared. I also plan to explore some of the issues behind my choice and comparing this to eugenics, which I found of high interest during my research. Additional criticisms that I refute will be of human cloning, germline engineering, and creating a designer baby. Lastly, I will explain her effect on society and some of the positive effects of genetic science.